Though anyway, FileZilla author focuses on performance primarily indeed, at expense of other features. With WinSCP we focus on other features relatively more.
The choice is yours. This is so clearly wrong. There are hundreds of confirmed reports here and elsewhere. After testing on network configurations across the world I know with absolute certainty that Filezilla is way faster than WinSCP, about three times faster for plain FTP uploads. I understand you focus on other things.
I am in the same position with Sardjent, i tried to use WinSCP as a filezilla replacement but it looks like there is a huge performance difference between the two. Hello, First of all, thank you for creating such a well designed program. However, i too think there is some kind of performance issue. This becomes obvious if i try to download a folder with a great number of small files.
In Filezilla i can set up up to 10 simultaneous connections and download starts immediately. In WinSCP it seems as if the contents of the folder are scanned first, and the program then starts to download one file after another at least this is what the status window led me to believe , although it already knows the contents of the folder.
Is this just my impression or is that really what happens? Maybe that is the cause of the sluggish performance? Again thank you very much, Regards, Paul. It has dragged along for several years now and new patches don't solve anything. My router and PC are more than capable of processing the rates. This subject is very complex, I heard a lot of factors may influence the speed of SFTP, including network latency.
Paulus wrote: First of all, thank you for creating such a well designed program. I've used winscp back quite a few years, if I'm actually on a windows client it's my go to. Snaps wrote: This is totally wrong for my situation It is not my CPU, that is for sure.
What is it that it limiting me, I do not know. I will only know when the problem is solved. My ftp is going too slow. I need help in fixing this problem.
Methraton wrote: martin wrote: Snaps wrote: This is totally wrong for my situation I will try out Filezilla and compare the two speeds. I've installed 5. This may be a limitation of the server I'm downloading from however, since I'm observing the same behavior while using Filezilla as well.
Good job on on the performance improvements! Lastest version here, using pscp. I'm using SCP protocol, is there some setting that I'm missing? All of these are on the same internal LAN segments ad don;t need to pass through a Router. Not sure what the issue could be, i tried playing with every transfer setting and they are set to unlimited. Not sure what else I could do to fix this, but I can't determine anything which is rate limiting these transfers when using WinSCP.
Am I going crazy??!? Anything anyone can think of to try? Maybe it's some setting in the ESXi and devices themselves? Hello, I would to know on my personal laptop the file transfer is very slow but on my office the transfer rate is very high. I don't know how to fix this problem. I have copy the same setting from my lab but still on my personal laptop it is slow.
Please, help me to fix this problem. Regards, Asif. I don't get the point. See, directory reading is really slow in long-distance link. Why should NOT we use multithreaded connection also with connection reuse!!! Is multithreading hard? Does it use too much resources? All I know is that if not multithreaded the directory reading takes forever to complete. Plus the file search is also very slow -- sequence searching? Jared H wrote: I don't get the point. This might be not related to CyberArk.
Also from where to where do you transfer files? If you transfer from or to RDP-redirected local drives, then there is an overhead of RDP protocol, which is not designed for data transfer and can cause slowness. Can you clarify a bit more what capabilities were removed, why it had a positive impact and if the positive impact was significant?
The only workaround at the moment would be to disable the keystrokes audit feature of PSMP. This is due to the fact that connection with wincp utilizes the PSMP-SSH connection component, which requires that the PSMP must log every command and every packet transferred from the source to the target. The auditing of this information causes a great amount of slowdown as this increases cpu utilization on psmp server.
0コメント